Business Transfers & Redundancies

Reorganisations, restructurings and redundancies are commonplace at present, whether they involve individual or collective redundancies.  Along with business transfers, whether through sale or asset acquisitions falling under the TUPE Regulations, these give rise to the need to provide employees with prescribed information and consultation, whether with employees individually or collectively through elected representatives.  Complying fully with these obligations can be difficult and complex, and the sanctions for failure to comply can lead to expensive claims, including for unfair dismissal (the maximum award for which is £95,585 (a compensatory award of £78,335) or 52 weeks' pay whichever is the lower per employee, subject to individual circumstances) and protective awards for failure to inform and consult correctly of up to 13 weeks' actual gross pay per employee affected, even if only one employee brings a claim.

We offer guidance though the statutory procedures and requirements, including in respect of the provision of information and appropriate consultation, and we prepare the necessary documentation with the aim of avoiding the creation of successful claims and to minimise disruption to the workforce at large.

Dismissals of protected employees made due to asset transfers are automatically unfair and employers are restricted from making changes to terms and conditions of employment for reasons linked to such transfers.  We advise on the employment implications of asset and share transfers and on the liabilities relating to transferring or inherited employees.  We can help negotiate warranties and indemnities to apportion risk in sale and purchase agreements and shareholders agreements.


Payroll World Conference 2015: Chris Weaver more>

Payne Hicks Beach bolsters Teams with internal promotions more>

Employers' obligations: storage of information around staff medical condition more>

Employer insolvency: What lessons can be learned from Jaeger's woes? more>

AI revolution and ‘Industry 4.0’ more>

Steps employers can take to ensure the mental health of staff more>

Syn values and Porky Lights more>

UK businesses may face claims after head scarf ruling more>

Plumber ruling 'wake-up' call for 'gig economy' businesses more>

Learn from PGA European Tour more>

Could “associate EU citizenship” become a worthwhile employee perk? more>

Sorry, Southern rail commuters, your boss can still ask you attend the office more>

Do you know your rights within the gig economy? more>

Can (and should) employers ditch bonuses? more>

Uber: Self-employed and worker status more>

Brexit and employment law more>

Unfair Tipping Practices more>

Supreme Court rules Morrisons vicariously liable for employee's violent attack more>

The PSC Register: A New Requirement for UK Companies more>

Supreme court finds Morrisons liable for employee's crime at work more>

Can your boss spy on your personal emails at work? more>

Just what is the employment status of Uber drivers? more>

How to avoid your own Chelsea FC doctor situation more>

How to deal with workplace dismissal more>

Will the Fit for Work service mean higher absence costs for small firms? more>

Shared parental leave in force from today more>

Trafficked au pair given permission to claim race discrimination more>

Surveillance - How much is too much? more>

You should not deny training or promotion to maternity leave staff more>

How to avoid religious discrimination claims more>

I am concerned for my staff more>

Legal issues to consider when employing an intern in your SME more>

What does the Equality Act 2010 mean for your business? more>