Privacy & Misuse of Private Information

The right to privacy is a fundamental protection to stop unwarranted and unwelcome intrusion into our private lives. The Human Rights Act ensures that the law reflects the entitlement of every person, from every walk of life, to enjoy a private life.

Such intrusion into peoples' lives can have a devastating effect and this is where Payne Hicks Beach can help. We have vast experience of advising claimants on the misuse of private information and are adept at dealing with the traditional media, social media and search engines where privacy is at stake.

By the nature of these claims it is difficult to provided examples of them. However, one which is in the public domain and in which we (led by Sarah Webb) acted is Hirschfeld v McGrath [2011] EWHC 249 (QB). To read the full judgment, please click here. Dominic Crossley acted in the leading privacy case of Mosley v News Group Newspapers.

As part of our privacy practice, we have significant experience of the law relating to voicemail interception ("phone hacking") and other investigatory techniques to intercept communications and/or obtain private and confidential information by unlawful means.

Payne Hicks Beach  

Coverage of Hanna Basha and Nick Grant joining Payne Hicks Beach more>

Payne Hicks Beach further strengthens its Privacy & Media Law offering more>

Citywealth Leaders List 2016 more>

The Legal Protection of Privacy and Free Expression more>

Spear's 500: Payne Hicks Beach Partners listed more>

Spear's: Reputation Management Index - Dominic Crossley more>

Fighting back against celebrity hacking more>

The Pokémon invasion of privacy more>

Melania Trump's legal action against The Daily Mail more>

The Sun and Mail Websites and Pippa Middleton: Double Fault more>

Privacy arguments before the courts reach record high more>

The Legal fallout from the Panama Papers more>

Citywealth Weekly Interview: Dominic Crossley more>

Can your boss spy on your personal emails at work? more>

Reputation rights and the deceased more>

No name, no claim? more>

Privacy injunctions and public perceptions more>

Ashley Madison hack more>

Keeping up appearances more>

Reputation Protection for the International Wealthy (Reluctantly) Famous more>

Lib Dems Target Media Lawyers more>

Samsung's listening TV is proof that tech has outpaced our rights more>

BBC doesn't deserve award for Sir Cliff raid broadcast more>

Justice denied: how media reforms have harmed the rights of companies more>

"Fake Sheikh" Saga: Lessons on Urgent Injunctive Relief for Corporates more>

Plebgate libel case: Andrew Mitchell may get a bill of up to £1.5m more>

'Fake sheikh' Panorama injunction bid more>

Plebgate trial and the new defamation act more>

Plebgate: a libel battle royal in the RCJ more>

Dominic Crossley: Privacy, criminal records and recruitment more>

Stars' naked pictures hacked for cash more>

What are you allowed to know about a job candidates criminal past? more>

The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard - Dominic Crossley more>

Case Law R(T) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department more>

Surveillance - How much is too much? more>

Privacy and/or security? more>

Disclosing cautions breaches privacy rights, Supreme Court rules more>

Privacy in Court Proceedings: Exposed – Dominic Crossley more>

Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v Google Inc more>

Ruusunen v Finland: the Private Life of a Prime Minister more>

Google down in Paris: how did it come to this? more>